AI Readability Checker
Check text without JavaScript, snippet directives and search crawler rules.
How does readable HTML differ from an accurate AI answer?
If content is missing, identify how it is rendered before changing the site. Script-dependent content needs additional verification rather than an automatic conclusion about every AI system.
Open the same URL with JavaScript disabled and compare the main answer. Then inspect robots.txt separately for OAI-SearchBot and GPTBot. Structured data should support information already visible on the page.
What to do step by step
- Compare server text and visible content.
- Check document language and meaningful headings.
- Review links that explain topic relationships.
- Assess declared crawler policies against your intent.
- Separate technical findings from factual content review.
How to make text in an image available in HTML
Teaching example; example.com addresses are illustrative.
Before
<main><img src="repair-prices.png" alt="Price list"></main>After
<main>
<h1>Bicycle repair prices</h1>
<p>A puncture repair includes a new tube and fitting.</p>
</main>Compare the server-text view to see whether the actual service answer is now present. Check the heading with h1-present and read the answer for meaning and completeness. This does not measure a citation by an AI service.
A common mistake
A score of 100 is not a 100% citation probability. Access, interpretation and source selection are different outcomes.
Try the report before checking your site.
Explore the sample report, then enter your own URL to see findings, HTML evidence and a repair plan for your page.
Run your audit
Compare server HTML with rendered content
Find a complete service condition in the server HTML, rendered page and audit text. Missing content in these views can have different causes.
- Compare the same URL, language and product option.
- Record whether an API supplies the missing sentence.
- Test a failed request, not just the happy path.
Can the text make sense without the page layout?
Read the extracted text without cards or colors. “From 30” needs a currency, unit and purchase condition to remain meaningful.
- Associate each price with its plan.
- Explain abbreviations on first use.
- Name linked documents by the task they support.
Does the page answer the reader’s question?
Ask a colleague to answer three questions using only the page. A specific misunderstanding is a better editing brief than an arbitrary word-count target.
- Who is the service suitable for?
- How is the price determined?
- What happens after submitting the form?
How to verify an AI readability improvement
After publishing, save the before and after evidence for the affected sentence. Technical readability and citation selection remain separate observations.
- Retest the public URL while signed out.
- Include another page using the same template.
- Measure actual citations through a separate question protocol.
How to verify the result
Retest the exact URL and locate the changed fact in server HTML and rendered content. If access is correct but an answer remains inaccurate, review the source wording before changing crawler policy.
Primary documentation developers.google.com ↗
Frequently asked questions
How does readable HTML differ from an accurate AI answer?
Available text is only an input. Accurate interpretation needs clear meaning, current facts, and context. A price without currency or an offer without conditions can be technically readable but misleading. Fukamo cannot establish how a specific model interprets that text.
When the task is complete
Verify main text, language, and structure. Then manually check whether extracting an important sentence changes its meaning. Keep qualifying conditions next to the claim they limit.
Related SEO guides
Check a specific page.
Fukamo shows findings, evidence and the next step.
679 rules + SEO, AI readability, performance and accessibility measurements for free.