Does a new report design change the meaning of old results?
Reordering the report does not alter rule outcomes. It makes handover simpler and reduces the chance of turning a passing check into an unnecessary task.
The PDF reports group repairs by the work needed on the site. The methodology explains errors, reviews and missing inputs. The rule catalogue lets you locate a check by its identifier and compare it with the original report.
What to do step by step
- The summary separates repairs, reviews, missing data and passes.
- Clickable contents lead to the relevant chapter.
- Status labels continue across chapter pages.
- Passes are grouped by category.
- Out-of-scope reference rules stay separate from repairs.
A practical example
A developer can open the first action section immediately. The owner can review successful properties that should survive the next redesign.
A common mistake
A shorter document does not necessarily contain less evidence. Repeated explanations can be grouped without removing rule IDs or findings.
Try the report before checking your site.
Explore the sample report, then enter your own URL to see findings, HTML evidence and a repair plan for your page.
Run your audit
How is the current PDF report organised?
The current complete export contains three PDFs — Items to review, Passed and Repair plan. The split helps assign work while preserving successful checks as a reference.
- Find repair steps in the plan and technical evidence alongside individual findings.
- Use passing results for regression checks after the next website edit.
What do statuses in the new summary mean?
A confirmed failure, a manual review and a missing measurement need different next steps. A report layout change does not alter these meanings.
- Assign a failure for repair and a contextual question to a specific decision-maker.
- Resolve unavailable data by obtaining evidence; do not count it among verified successes.
How to compare an older and newer report
With a new report, inspect the URL, time and rules. A document’s page count can change through typography or grouping repeated occurrences.
- For the same rule ID, compare the status and specific evidence.
- Record changed inputs or measurement availability before concluding that the website improved.
How to try the current export
This page explains the current output format. The separate catalogue and methodology describe available checks and the meaning of scores.
- Audit one public URL and inspect both the summary and a finding’s detail.
- Download the complete export and check whether a colleague can identify the next step from the evidence.
How to verify the result
Download a report from a current scan and inspect its contents and status separation. The scoring methodology remains documented independently.
Frequently asked questions
Does a new report design change the meaning of old results?
A visual change does not alter historical evidence. When comparing reports, account for methodology, inputs, and rule changes too. A clearer layout may emphasize a task already present in the report; that does not automatically mean your website developed a new defect.
When the task is complete
Compare identifiers and evidence rather than colors or positions. Retain the original document to preserve the scan context.
Related SEO guides
Check a specific page.
Fukamo shows findings, evidence and the next step.
679 rules + SEO, AI readability, performance and accessibility measurements for free.